<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Walkies!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davies.lohudblogs.com/2008/02/23/walkies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davies.lohudblogs.com/2008/02/23/walkies/</link>
	<description>The editorial cartoons of Matt Davies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:24:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DebS</title>
		<link>http://davies.lohudblogs.com/2008/02/23/walkies/comment-page-1/#comment-4605</link>
		<dc:creator>DebS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davies.lohudblogs.com/2008/02/23/walkies/#comment-4605</guid>
		<description>Matt,

Are you referring to the NY TIMES article about McCain&#039;s ties to a female lobbyist?

If I understand you correctly, you&#039;re saying that he was accused of overlooking his own ETHICS violations, not of sexual misconduct.

I read the article &amp; came away w/the same notion I think you did.

So, why do the mainstream evening-news broadcasters get a free pass on this one?  They distorted the story, made the issue into another tawdry sex scandal, &amp; apparently didn&#039;t read or chose to ignore the real substance of the story.

Where is our outrage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,</p>
<p>Are you referring to the NY TIMES article about McCain&#8217;s ties to a female lobbyist?</p>
<p>If I understand you correctly, you&#8217;re saying that he was accused of overlooking his own ETHICS violations, not of sexual misconduct.</p>
<p>I read the article &#038; came away w/the same notion I think you did.</p>
<p>So, why do the mainstream evening-news broadcasters get a free pass on this one?  They distorted the story, made the issue into another tawdry sex scandal, &#038; apparently didn&#8217;t read or chose to ignore the real substance of the story.</p>
<p>Where is our outrage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
