<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grief. It&#8217;s What&#8217;s For Dinner.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davies.lohudblogs.com/2008/02/26/grief-its-whats-for-dinner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davies.lohudblogs.com/2008/02/26/grief-its-whats-for-dinner/</link>
	<description>The editorial cartoons of Matt Davies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:24:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Talitha</title>
		<link>http://davies.lohudblogs.com/2008/02/26/grief-its-whats-for-dinner/comment-page-1/#comment-4674</link>
		<dc:creator>Talitha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davies.lohudblogs.com/2008/02/26/grief-its-whats-for-dinner/#comment-4674</guid>
		<description>If the slaughter business would upgrade their technology to controlled atmospheric killing, a lot of the grief that goes with slaughter would be eliminated.  In addition to improving conditions for these poor creatures, there would be less injury to slaughter house workers and a reduction in the resulting workman&#039;s comp claims. An added benefit would be improved quality of meat - less bruising, broken bones and stress hormones.  Why don&#039;t slaughterhouses use controlled atmospheric killing??  Their costs would be reduced and their yield would be increased! It is baffling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the slaughter business would upgrade their technology to controlled atmospheric killing, a lot of the grief that goes with slaughter would be eliminated.  In addition to improving conditions for these poor creatures, there would be less injury to slaughter house workers and a reduction in the resulting workman&#8217;s comp claims. An added benefit would be improved quality of meat &#8211; less bruising, broken bones and stress hormones.  Why don&#8217;t slaughterhouses use controlled atmospheric killing??  Their costs would be reduced and their yield would be increased! It is baffling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcie Berry</title>
		<link>http://davies.lohudblogs.com/2008/02/26/grief-its-whats-for-dinner/comment-page-1/#comment-4618</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcie Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davies.lohudblogs.com/2008/02/26/grief-its-whats-for-dinner/#comment-4618</guid>
		<description>Hey Matt

I wanted to check in on your blog to see if you had done a cartoon on the beef recall. I like it! The whole situation is really interesting, and sad of course. I&#039;m going to pass along your cartoon to my classmates.

hope things are going well!
Marcie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Matt</p>
<p>I wanted to check in on your blog to see if you had done a cartoon on the beef recall. I like it! The whole situation is really interesting, and sad of course. I&#8217;m going to pass along your cartoon to my classmates.</p>
<p>hope things are going well!<br />
Marcie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike C</title>
		<link>http://davies.lohudblogs.com/2008/02/26/grief-its-whats-for-dinner/comment-page-1/#comment-4607</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davies.lohudblogs.com/2008/02/26/grief-its-whats-for-dinner/#comment-4607</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039;m going to go grab a hamburger right now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;m going to go grab a hamburger right now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
