Yes I have and from what I have read from non-partisan sites (unlike your beloved left-wing NY Times) he was guilty of tazering a child.

Hey, if your hero Hillary had merely fired Billy Dale, there wouldn’t be a story. But she tried to RUIN him by getting him thrown in jail AND bankrupting him. A little different, sorry to say.

Ever heard about SP’s getting her ex-brother-in-law (the state trooper)fired ‘cause she didn’t like him?

I hear now that SP might have retired cause she’s the subject of so many ethics probes. On the same subject, she owes $$$ for legal fees to defend herself in those cases. She’s distracted (the NY Times says) that she’s having trouble governing.

So, as far as the future of the GOP, anotheer one bites the dust.

Look up “Travelgate” and tell me your opinion of Hillary Clinton is the same. This woman attempted to destroy the non-partisan White House travel secretary, Billy Dale, in 1993/1994 simply because she wanted her friends the Thomasons to take over running the office. So rather than simply firing him, she had trumped up charges brought against him so she wouldn’t be seen as the one who fired the long-time travel secretary. She is a piece of scum.

By the way, the charges agianst Billy Dale were dropped after three hours of grand jury testimony. But not before Billy had to spend most of his life savings defending himself against the charges.

Bulldog,
Are you kidding about Hillary’s creds being the same as SP’s? How are these 2 women remotely similar? 2 start w/just check out their educational backgrounds. Then go on to their life experience: Hill’s a successful lawyer, former Senator of NY, etc.

We NYers voted Hill into office for getting ahead using her brains & guts. In the words of those times, she’s her own woman. She’s Sec. of State not because she’s just A WOMAN -your caps Bulldog. She’s SOS because Obama recognized: her extraordinary intellectual gifts; her command of so many subjects on the campaign trail against him; her loyal supporters on the same campaign trail; her ranking member status on influential Senate committees; etc.

Not all women were created equal; some are way better than others.

Debs point is that the ONLY reason Palin was chosen was because she was a woman. That does not apply to Hillary. Hillary has her own creds and some coattail action.

And Deb—SP is a glory hound that saw her opportunity and took it. She may be dim in other ways but her ability to ingratiate herself to the stage is her singular ability.

Just who’s ancestors are you talking about? If it’s mine, I’d like to know where we’ve met before.

@ All of you guys above (any woman posting there?)
As a woman, I’m not flattered much by anyone’s
saying Sarah Palin is a great example of what women can accomplish.

Are any of you guys & gals above asking yourselves whether John McCain is part of any good ole boy network? Think his inviting her on his ticket represents a step forward for women or a cynical attempt to get the ‘women’s vote’? In fact, I think S.P. is a total fool for letting herself be exploited cause she’s got boobs & babies.

Seeing her w/the eyes of a woman, I don’t feel SP has offered much except an ability to whip up caribou burgers for Matt Lauer, look pretty in lipstick, & make uninformed statements not worthy of a political novice of either gender.

Again, in my opinion, the truly admirable women are female Supreme Court Justices, Senators, astronauts, police officers, ER MDs, nurses & so forth. Our heros, our sterling examples!